| From: | Pantherr pantherr@*****.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | On Cybereyes |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 1999 01:59:37 -0500 |
> > All basic aura reading is (as far as I can tell) is adapting your eyes to
> > see the interfeerence of the body's EM field or something along those
> > lines. It occasionally shows up with cameras, particularly GOOD quality
> > video taken in reduced light conditions without lights or starlight
>filters
> > or with LOW speed still footage.
> >
>All aura reading is rediculous, superstitious, self-delusion or intentional
>mis-representation.
>
>Hey, folks, magic isn't real! Press pause on the fantasy deck before you
>stop roleplaying!
Whoa. Hold up here. is this an attempt to flame? Ok, before this gets
out of hand, let's take a look at something that (IMHO, at least) proves
the existence and viewability of what, for argument's sake, I'll call an
'aura'.
Kirlian photography, which has been scientifically tested/experimented
with/researched for DECADES, appears to show exactly what the person you're
flaming, abortion_engine, is describing. I recommend doing your homework
before attacking someone's words. It makes for a much more convincing
argument, I'm sure you'll agree. :)
Pantherr
