Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Strago strago@***.com
Subject: Magic Resistance Edge (Was Heal/Treat...
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 17:20:44 -0400
Ereskanti@***.com wrote:

> In a message dated 9/14/1999 11:44:59 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
> LOSLOBOS5@***.com writes:
>
> >
> > IMHO, since MITS is official 3rd Edition, and since the official 3rd
> > Edition Shadowrun Companion states that a character with this edge "is
> never
> > a willing subject for spells with the requires a voluntary subject
> modifer.
> > Such spells automatically fail when used on magic resistant characters" In
> > others words, he is SOL. You cannot have your cake and expect to also eat
> it.
>
> Good point, and besides, Magic Resistance as an edge is nice, yes, but it's
> also got that nasty double-edge to it. Something we've done is alter the
> edge and its' purchase cost IF the player wants to choose so. They can
> choose a single category of spells to be resistant at if they want to
> (Combat, Detection, Illusion, Health, Manipulation). So far though, no one
> has even *wanted* magic resistance at all.
>
> -K

I'm a bit confused. If a player said he wanted the edge, I'd assume it would
deal with spells that were RESISTED, aka a Powerbolt. IF that were true, the edge
would be useful. Why would ANYONE want to resist spells that require a voluntary
target? Could you see the face say "Please, Mr. Mage, don't put the Increased
Reflexes spell on me, I don't want to be faster"? That's what the edge as others
have posted seems to me. Totally worthless.

--
--Strago

The gene pool in the 21st century needs a deep cleaning. I am the chlorine.

SRGC v0.2 !SR1 SR2++ !SR3 h b++ B- UB- IE+ RN++ sa++ ma++ ad+ m+ (o++ d+) gm+ M-

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.