Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Cyberware and Cosmetic Surgery
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:26:29 +0200
According to Iridios, at 11:15 on 20 Sep 99, the word on
the street was...

> Something that's been on my mind of late. How much "evidence" (in
> the form of scarring) is left after cybernetic implant surgery?

Not much, I'd say -- much of the cyberware implantation process is done by
nanites, says Shadowtech, which can be injected without the need for
surgery.

> Personally I would assume that plastic surgery has advance enough to
> easily cover "small" scars and such, but is it available from street
> docs or street clinics? And wouldn't major implants (such as wired
> reflexes) leave some scars even after plastic surgery? Would it be
> possible to go to a specialized plastic surgeon to completely cover
> all implant scarring? And how would one measure how notable scarring
> might be? Would 10 - [essence cost](modified by additional plastic
> surgery) be too high or too low of a target number to notice
> scarring?

You can simply use the rules from Cybertechnology for this: the wound
caused by implant surgery is determined by the Essence cost (see SRII --
it's not in SR3 -- p. 114), and then use the scarring rules on page 56 of
Cybertechnology to decide how big the scar will be.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Vraag niet om de terugkeer
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.