Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: [OT] Life Sucks
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 19:43:27 +0100
According to Marc Renouf, at 12:56 on 2 Feb 99, the word on
the street was...

> Hey, Gurth. What's the haps?

Same as always -- I write too much mail to this list :)

> Hey, did you ever get hold of those combat boots you were looking for?

Not yet, and I've had what, 3+ years for it now? :) I might try to find
some this summer, though.

> > (For those keeping track, this is NOT another sign of impending doom for
> > the list. We need Rob Hayden back for that.)
>
> I take it that we are still without a Fearless Leader, then?

That's Mark Imbriaco's job now. What I was referring to is that there was
once a prophesy that the list would end when four people would return:
J.D. Falk, Stainless Steel Rat, Doctor Doom, and Rob Hayden. The first
three have appeared since that prophesy-post was made (Rat within a few
days, even), but Rob hasn't. Yet...

[Shadowland]
> That was more or less what I figured, I just wanted to be sure.
> I'm on the new list now, so hopefully I'll have more of a clue about
> what's going on. :)

It should be(come) the same list ShadowRN has always been, I think.
Whether that means anyone will have a clue about anything or not remains
to be seen ;)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
And that's as far as the conversation went.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.