Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Woods <david@*******.FREESERVE.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Ultrasound vision
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:03:28 +0000
Marc Renouf wrote:
>
> The "acoustic daylight" stuff is cool, but represents a pretty
> serious computational burden. First off, you're looking at sound over a
> variety of frequencies, some of which attenuate quickly, some of which do
> not. The other problem you have is binocular localization. You need an
> array of sensors to be able to determine directionality of the background
> noise.

Directionality. Good point. I seem to recall this being a the main
thrust of a related post a while back.

> Tiny microphones are all well and good, but there are problems
> giving them enough directional focus to be able to accurately determine
> direction (especially at distance).

How is this achieved?

Would that be done with the acoustic equivalent of a lens, parabolic
mirror or something else?

> Granted, packing a lot of them
> together helps, but you still have problems.

Even with "linear algebra transmission matrices"...

Regards

- David Woods

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.