Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Paul Gettle <RunnerPaul@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: State of the Industry
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 12:28:25 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 12:46 PM 2/7/99 +1000, Lady Jestyr wrote:
>>And FASA has also cited this as the reason for file 13ing Earthdawn.
Why
>>does MS's computer rights prohibit the selling of Earthdawn?
Something is
>>being left out.
>
>Or perhaps you're not reading between the lines:
>
>It is reasonable to assume that the sale of the Earthdawn *COMPUTER*
rights
>to MS made the Earthdawn *RPG* a less appealing bundle, reducing
FASA's
>chance of selling it. We live in the Age of the Tie-in - computer
game
>tie-ins (of anything) are all the rage. If potential buyers for
Earthdawn
>could have been promised the computer game rights as well as the
>pen-and-paper RPG, it would have had a much better chance at selling.

Especially given FASA's track record for developing spin-off computer
games from their table top games.

Shadowrun for the Super Nintendo, Shadowrun for the Sega Genesis (two
entirely different games, btw, not just the same game ported across
two platforms), all the different MechWarrior games, MechCommander,
not to mention the games in development like SR: Assassin.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQCVAwUBNr3NLKPbvUVI86rNAQGvEgP9HMvPgm+6F5A0vnQVVDTzVLMi1WrDQQFL
ve5OAPHyUq+FtQZp2LHUnrMg79msTgXa8oF6ChMpWjvdbz4Wl2q/4z8uwNAIR2CI
x2MNvs9GF5vBjtR5+0b+t6FhE/tIXCveYmFNorgHlCQI38OJrAUROA20sDdwzFVG
P/VsSO1o6Ws=
=scZu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.