Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: greg basa <demipop@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: NPCs
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 02:27:04 -0500
>>OK, it's my favorite time of vice-GMing, NPC creation. While I
>>usually make opponents for my team that are a little bit better or
on
>>the level of the players, I'm now in the process of creating a
>>near-superhuman NPC, something along the lines of a high-level
>>physical adept that the party will be running into on a steady basis
>>(a wandering swordsman who is a decent source of info; though he
won't
>>actively join in the fighting, he's good enough that he can defend
>>himself against most threats, like a corporate strike team... or the
>>PCs themselves). Now I'm thinking superhuman should be around the
>>200-300 karma, though 100 karma should be enough. However, I have
>>seen some pretty powerful characters out there.
>
>What are you asking? Do you want physad power suggestions, karma
point
>ranges, what? :)


Karma point ranges. The trouble with physads is that, like all
magic-users, they eat up karma faster than Krunchers
(Mmmm...jalepeno), so I can see most of that karma going straight to
powers. In fact, I sorta just gave up on asking and gave him 300
karma outright. Hell, the character's truning out to be so
interesting I might just write some fiction on him (it's been a
while...).

As far suggestions, does anyone know what counterstrike and enhanced
centering do? Can edged weapon combat be used as a centering skill?


>--
>D. Ghost
>(aka Pixel, Tantrum, RuPixel)
>"You, you're like a spoonful of whoopass." --Grace
>"A magician is always 'touching' himself" --Page 123, Grimoire (2nd
>Edition)
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at
http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
>or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.