Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: dbuehrer@******.carl.org dbuehrer@******.carl.org
Subject: shock weapon question.
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 07:45:23 -0600
Aristotle wrote:
>Greetings -n- Salutations,
>
>Recently my group was ambushed at a bar. The only weapon available to them
>was a taser. While running the combat a question came up. Is the modifier
>to target numbers for being shocked cumulative, or is it the number of
>rounds the part that adds up?
>
>.:Example:.
>The attacker hits the target with a taser, all appropriate rolls are made
>and the target is "shocked" for 4 rounds at +2. Since the taser is a
>semi-auto the attacker fires another round. This time the target is
>shocked for 3 rounds at +2. Does this mean that the target is at +4 for 3
>rounds and +2 for the last round, or does this mean that the target's
>target numbers are at +2 for 4+3=7 rounds?

I would rule that the greater of the two effects takes precedence. The
target would suffer a +2 modifier for four rounds.

If you really want the effect to be cumulative then I would suggest adding
everything. In the above case the target would suffer a +4 modifier for
seven rounds. However, in that case if the modifier exceeded the target's
Body I would rule that the target would have to make a Body or Willpower
(whichever is higher) test vs the modifier or suffer a heart attack. I.e.,
players wouldn't be able to take advantage of the cumulative effect without
taking the risk of killing the target. And if the players think being able
to kill opponents by giving them heart attacks is a good thing, well...
every Lone Star officer is armed with a taser.. <EGMG>.



To Life,
-Graht
http://www.users.uswest.net/~abaker3
--
"Warm nights, good food, kindred spirits....great life!"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.