Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phil Smith phil_urbanhell@*******.com
Subject: Magical SOTA?
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 21:11:08 GMT
>From: dartheggbert@****.com
> > >They say that the magic level is rising, but actually hardly
> > >anything has really changed since first edition (the game mechanics
> > >are different, but magic hasn't become more powerful IMO).
>
> > Well, since SR1 they've added watchers, new foci types, new
> > metamagic techniques, and more stuff for spirits.
>
>They have also increased the amount of Magical Threats ( Toxics, Wraiths,
>Insects, Blood Magic, and the new Year of the Comet Stuff), There are
>more classes of Magics ( Voudun, WuXun) More types of spirits (Spirits of
>the Elements, Ancestor Spirits, Loa), more types of magicians ( adepts,
>Aspected magicians, physical mages) And finally more metahumans and a
>wider spread of them( It started out that meta's were priority A now they
>are C or D) Drain between SR1 and SR2 was halved (SR1 was F SR2 was
>.5F)And finally they also state in MitS that the number of magic users
>has jumped from 1% to over 2%.
>
>I'd say magic has changed from SR1 and it's only been 10 years, imagine
>what will happen in the next 10.

Yeah, but none of the magic books (or very few) said "this is new; it wasn't
there before." As Gurth was saying before; they don't attribute a lot to
the magical SOTA. The way I read it is that the main rulebook outlines what
most magic users are doing. The other magic rulebooks tell us what the
wierd ones are up to.

Phil

Let us assume we have a can opener.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.