Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Keith Duthie psycho@*********.co.nz
Subject: Invisibility question...
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:01:17 +1300 (NZDT)
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Bira wrote:

> You needn't get that academic. I'd say he can't cast the spell
> on the bag because it's too dark in there for he to see it! :). However,
> if enough light filters through the nylon that he can see the bag around
> his head, he could cast the spell _on the bag_, and make it invisible.
> Of course, then everyone else would know he did this, and could proceed
> to beat the mage to a pulp.
I'd say that he could cast invisibility on the bag if he could see it, and
make it invisible, but that he couldn't cast any mana based spells because
he doesn't have LOS on the astral. I'd be a bit iffy on physical spells,
too.

--
Understanding is a three edged sword. Do you *want* to get the point?
http://www.albatross.co.nz/~psycho/ O- -><-
Standard disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this message are unlikely to
be mine, let alone anybody elses...

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.