Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: While we're on the topic of munchkins...
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:21:34 +0200
According to Rand Ratinac, at 16:39 on 17 Oct 00, the word on the street
was...

> Still, 17+5d6 isn't bad.

18+5D6 to be precise -- I made a little mistake by forgetting to include
the Reaction bonus that night ones get.

> Btw, Gurth, off the top of my head, I think the best
> answer to your challenge would be an adept.
[snip]
> Then, with your two "spare" points, buy 6 reaction enhancers. 19 or
> 20+4d6.

Sounds good.

> You could try with cyber, but you couldn't match that
> with a starting character. To fit all the cyber in
> required to match that without becoming a cyberzombie,
> you'd be spending a lot more than a million.

Let's run the numbers:

Item Reaction Initiative Nuyen Essence Bio
Quickness 8 } 7 1D6
Intelligence 6}
Wired Reflexes 3 +6 +3D6 500,000 5
Reaction Enhancer 3 +3 180,000 .9
Muscle Toner 4 +2 100,000 1.6
Enh. Articulation +1 60,000 .6
Suprathyroid Gland +1 50,000 1.4
Cerebral Booster 2 +1 110,000 .8

Totals: 21 +4D6 1,000,000 5.9 4.4

Yes, bioware overstress will definitely apply here :) But by taking the
Exceptional Attribute edge for both Quickness and Intelligence we can add
another +1 to make it 22+4D6.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
It was a warning shot that missed.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+@ UL P L+ E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X+ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.