Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Florian Schaetz (Irian) iryan@********.de
Subject: Some matrix queries
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:28:17 +0200
> > Try to program it yourself. it will take a while, but when you're
> > finished, you could even sell it...
>
> Of course, it's not like the programming rules are all that coherent
> either...768 base days to program...taking the example from
VR2...getting 4
> successes (two bought with Karma)...192 days..which is a little over 6
> months. Then add in task bonuses, and its still a long time working
:) All
> this is VR2 of course. Matrix times may, or maynot be better, often
times
> the lack of task bonuses get in the way of lower programming times.

Oh, I think 48 days for a Rating 8 Frame ist not a long time... (You got
a task bonus of +3 for double memory and a programming shop).

Matrix Rules:

No Task Bonus any longer. Base Time is Size (not double size). Make a
computer(prog) roll against the rating, modified by some things (double
memory adds -2 for example). You have to make a programming-plan before
(using a special knowledge-Skill), every success there gives you
another -1 on the roll. I would prepare a really good plan, using a
computer with double memory (or perhaps rent a time on a mainframe,
gives you -1 to -4)... So when you had 4 success on 8 you now have
perhaps 8 successes on 4... Comes again to 48 days :-)
Oh, and btw: With a programming shop you get bonus-dice.

> Guess it depends on if you have the time or the money...

As I said... 48 days are not too long, I think.

> There was a post a couple of months ago after GC done by Tzeentch on
> comparing programming times in VR2 and Matrix. I'd suggest people
take a
> look at it, see what they think. (and the resulting comments on it).

I can compare them myself... :-). I would say, it depends. Imho VR2
Rules were better for Deckers with lower skill...

Irian

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.