Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Some matrix queries
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:58:27 +0200
According to Phil Smith, on Tue, 24 Oct 2000 the word on the street was...

> 1) When designing a frame, is the memory size of the programmes it packs
> included in its memory size? eg. my rating 8 smart frame takes up 384MP
> (what with having a multiplier of 6). It includes an Armor 3 programme,
> Medic 3 and Attack-S 5 which take up 27MP, 36MP and 100MP respectively. Is
> the size of the programme 384MP or 547MP?

It says in the Programming chapter of The Matrix that "The actual size of a
frame or agent is the actual size of the frame core plus the actual size of
all the programs and options loaded on it." (Sorry, no page reference as I
still don't have an actual book :) That should answer that question -- your
frame would be 384 Mp, plus 163 Mp for the utilities, making a total of 547
Mp.

> 2) The price of programmes is listed in SR3 as being Size x (cost based on
> rating), does this refer to memory size? Because if it does in rating 7-9
> programmes you are paying 500¥ per MP!

It's the program's actual size (including options) in Mp, so yes, that gets
expensive. A rating 7 utility with a size multiplier of 4 and no options
would cost 7^2 x 4 x 500 = 98,000 nuyen, for example.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
It was a warning shot that missed.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+@ UL P L+ E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X+ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.