Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: vocenoctum@****.com vocenoctum@****.com
Subject: Mike Mulvihill on STATE OF THE ART
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:27:45 -0400
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 14:56:41 -0400 "Ojaste,James [NCR]"
<James.Ojaste@**.GC.CA> writes:
> Hm. Differing terminology I guess. I wouldn't call that fiction,
> I'd call it a description of the world as narrated by a fictional
> character. The description itself is no more fictional than the
> rest of the game (ie "anybody" could have made those
> observations)...
>
> James Ojaste
>
>

So, In Character vs. Out of Character would be more accurate.
I prefer the half and half, but I'd rather have a mixed book (SOTA: 2061)
since that way I don't have to wait until "SOTA: Magic" for magic stuff,
since this year is "SOTA: CorpSec" or some such.
I liked CorpSec and FoF, but I feel teh books would have more use to be
more varied (though, not as chaotic as Neo A's Real Life)
To update the corporate security wouldn't require a complete book, since
a lot of the stuff is already in another place in SR3, but a good IC
breakdown would be nice. I'd also love to see some new magic, and new
edges/flaws too, which don't need IC descriptions at all.

Also, to make sure it's clear, there is NO shadowtalk. The IC parts will
be more in teh way of explaining the new rules or new ways of doing stuff
AFAIK. You're not getting a catalog with shadowtalk comments underneath
or such.

Vocenoctum
<http://members.xoom.com/vocenoctum>;

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.