| From: | vocenoctum@****.com vocenoctum@****.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Mike Mulvihill on STATE OF THE ART |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:29:27 -0400 |
<pgoodman13@************.com> writes:
> From: <vocenoctum@****.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 4:27 PM
>
> > Also, to make sure it's clear, there is NO shadowtalk.
>
> Eh? Where'd you get that? No shadowtalk in rules, yes, but in the
> fiction?
> If I have anything to say about it, there's going to be shadowtalk
> galore.
> Don't make the mistake of thinking that "no shadowtalk in rules"
> means "no
> shadowtalk."
Eh, I phrased it poorly. The IC stuff will contain shadowcommentary, or
perhaps be totally shadowrunner provided (ala Corp DL)
The old style of shadowtalk is what I meant by "shadowtalk". The
commentary on each of the items, etc.
Vocenoctum
<http://members.xoom.com/vocenoctum>;
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
