From: | Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Mike Mulvihill on STATE OF THE ART |
Date: | Wed, 25 Oct 2000 20:02:23 -0700 (PDT) |
> I prefer the half and half, but I'd rather have a
mixed book (SOTA: 2061) since that way I don't have to
wait until "SOTA: Magic" for magic stuff, since this
year is "SOTA: CorpSec" or some such. I liked CorpSec
and FoF, but I feel teh books would have more use to
be more varied (though, not as chaotic as Neo A's Real
Life)
<snipt!(TM)>
> Vocenoctum
Hey, guys, read the note carefully.
If I'm not mistaken, Mike's saying that the format of
the SOTA books doesn't have to be set in stone. If we
decide we'd like a mix of Rules Theme and Fiction
Theme SOTA books, they could do that. That's what I've
suggested, for exactly the same reasons as what
Vocenoctum has said above. The Rules Theme books means
we wouldn't have to wait years to get the latest magic
or decking or gun updates, but the Fiction Theme books
would probably cover stuff that might never be covered
in SR books otherwise.
====Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow, aka Doc'booner, aka Doc' Vader)
.sig Sauer
Can you SMELL what THE DOC' is COOKIN'!!!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/