Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Lee Decker leedecker@******.com
Subject: Mike Mulvihill on STATE OF THE ART
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:47:59 -0400
> I understand and I'm not really surprised about that really. What
>concerns me is the fact that since Fasa is gunning for new players (ie
>those who have never gamed before) the color and imagination level of the
>rules has been and perhaps will be cranked down to the lowest common
>denominator. I don't like that.
> Unimaginative players shouldn't BE players. I realize that this
>isn't much of an argument to Fasa who's goal is to sell books, but Joe
>Sixpack the frat guy is never gonna play SR. Lets not fill the game with
>keg references in an attempt to get him to.

I've pretty much dropped off the list, but this thread got my
attention.
To me you just hit one of the fundamental reasons I haven't bought the last
several
SR books and don't plan on it. To me SR3 saw a nice tightening up of the
rules which I liked, but alot of the imagination that made each book unique
was now gone.
I for one loved the shadowtalk and story lines in each book. Many were used
as plot hooks at one time or another. I used to reread books looking for
ideas to use against my players. The new stuff I picked up, read once. Made
a note of the new rules and put it on a shelf.
I understand and have understood Fasa's need to spread its player base. But
I know my gaming group has since fallen apart and moved onto other things
besides SR partly due to this shift.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED

Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from the nature of the following communication, the
information contained herein is attorney-client privileged and confidential
information/work product. The communication is intended for the use of the individual or
entity named above. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error or are not sure
whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any
copies, electronic, paper or otherwise, which you may have of this communication.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.