Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: vocenoctum@****.com vocenoctum@****.com
Subject: Mike Mulvihill on STATE OF THE ART
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 20:32:47 -0400
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:49:11 +0200 Gurth <gurth@******.nl> writes:
> FASA's solution appears to be to cut these comments altogether,
> instead of
> the other option, namely giving rules that support the
> shadowcomments. And
> I know the objection against that solution: it limits the players'
> imagination. Still, OTOH at least it would mean the items would
> still have
> that extra bit of color.
>

As long as it added a little flavor it'd be nice.
I've noticed that a lot of the "shadowcomments" seem to go either "yeah,
I agree with what was just said" or are totally off the wall
contradictions. Not as much gray area as it used to be.
(IMO of course)

I'd also like an update on some of the characters that became familiar
through that shadowtalk.

Vocenoctum
<http://members.xoom.com/vocenoctum>;

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.