Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: NeoJudas neojudas@******************.com
Subject: Mike Mulvihill on STATE OF THE ART
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:55:24 -0500
From: "Rand Ratinac" <docwagon101@*****.com>
Subject: Re: Mike Mulvihill on STATE OF THE ART


> <snipt!(TM)>
> > That's exactly what he's saying. Which is why it's
> kinda disappointing that the AOL forums havn't really
> had much response since I posted this there Monday.
> >
> > The more input he gets about what the players want,
> the better off. (or, rather, if no one says anything,
> don't blame Mike if you don't like the resulting
> product :-)
> > Vocenoctum

Ah, I don't go to the AOL account very often, if ever simply because I'm too
busy. I may keep it in mind however for the future. Also note Voce, that
FASA has finally gone to domain email mapping, so the "AOL Accounts" are not
watched as closely as they once were (hence, the (shadowrun@****.com)
instead of FASAMike@***.com).
>
> Well, seeing as how I'm apparently the only person
> who's responded directly to Mike about this, the SOTA
> books should have exactly what I want in them,
> shouldn't they? ;)

Hmmm ... why is it, I have a sudden urge to break something here....
anyways... VN is correct in that any feedback that FASA:SR gets, the better.
But as for the rumor in the other post about Battletech getting all the
credit, that simply is no longer the case. Shadowrun now outsells
Battletech and has for more than a year solid.

Granted, with the merciless release schedule of the future (the HHH movies
indicated such a while ago actually), it will be anyones guess who takes the
lead in 2001.

Oh yeah... and I'm back...

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
J. Keith Henry (Webmaster)
Hoosier Hacker House (www.hoosierhackerhouse.com)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.