Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Brother Justice brother_justice@*******.com
Subject: Source Vs. Rule (was... MM on SOTA somesuchcrap)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:45:22 EST
>From: NightLife <NightLife@********.com>
>Reply-To: shadowrn@*********.com
>To: shadowrn@*********.com
>Subject: Re: Source Vs. Rule (was... MM on SOTA somesuchcrap)
>Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:05:05 -0500
>
>
>
>Now it a place where sides decide what get talked about,
>who can or can't say something in particular. It's become who buddy buddy
>with Mike this month or who's got their submission printed to Fasa who's
>accorded more say and lienency. I can remember when Spike would tear into
>somebody without out fear of retribution because he was friends with this
>group over here and they where on the DLOH Christmas card list. I can also
>remember when things where somewhat fair, before this elitist attitude
>overtook the whole list and half of those who used to be here left. It's a
>sad thing. I also realize this will probably get me banned but I don't care
>anymore.

NightLife, I'll be right behind you going out the door if that's the case.
Sentiments long felt by myself have finally come to light in a much better
way than I could state it. And though, you'll probably not know how much
what you said helped, you've given me a lot to think about. And yes, I
realize that this probably should have gone off-list, but I wanted to show
some support to what NL had to say.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.