Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: NightLife NightLife@********.com
Subject: Source Vs. Rule (was... MM on SOTA somesuchcrap)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 03:26:13 -0500
>There are problems with the online Shadowrun community, but I don't
>believe that the Administration of ShadowRN adds to it - ShadowRN has
>always had open and free-wheeling discussion about Shadowrun, and even
>though most of us on the Admin team are now freelancers for FASA, I don't
>think this has changed.

This is where I have to point something out. If indeed you are employed in
anyway by Fasa it kind of like getting both sides of the muffin buttered.
Don't take this as a personal insult Adam but humans being human tend to
protect the hand that feeds them. Not yourself but others have and it needs
to stop.

>Please do not mistake the opinion of vocal posters for the opinion of the
>list Administration (unless said vocal posters are the list
>Administration, but please also recognize that we're all real people with
>opinions, not just mindless robots here to run the server). I won't
>apolgize for Keith's actions because it's simply not my place to do so,
>but I'm asking that you don't look at him and see "ShadowRN", because he's
>but one member of a very large list. The same goes for every other member.
>I'm not ShadowRN. Steve Kenson isn't ShadowRN. Gurth isn't ShadowRN.

But the connotation is there. Just as I've said with other things. If you
working for Fasa and maintaining this list then personal and professional
convergences are inevitable. This means that changes are in order. If
Granite were still around I'd give him the nod for an addition to the admin
team and right now I can't think of anybody else except for Tinner but I
don't think he'd be up to the position.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.