Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: shadowrn@*********.com (Dale C. Blessing)
Subject: New to the List / Need a good Street Name
Date: Thu Sep 6 22:00:01 2001
Hi Boondocker:
No correction needed. The reaction from the list just
surprised me. I was looking both for character names
and a "list name".---But...Thwap Bait? Woodchuck
Bot?Guess you have to be a insider...though it does
indicate that this is one of the cooler (crazier?)and
more tolerant lists.

Cheers

Dale
--- BD <l3oondocker@*****.com> wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone who gave a serious reply to my
> > question.
>
> Um... I answered half of it seriously... duzzat
> count?
>
> > As for the rest of you......Hope you had fun!
>
> Sure did. ;)
>
> BTW, if you're just looking for a nick to go by
> onlist, I wouldn't sweat
> it. Dale's pretty unique, and you might eventually
> come across some
> neato-cool moniker that you want to try out. Or you
> might dredge up a real
> gong like 'Boondocker' or 'Doc''... you never know.
> :)
>
> If, on the other hand, you're looking to name a
> character (like some
> folks thought) then I guess we shouldn't have joshed
> ya. Or at least
> joshed you more appropriately... there are plenty of
> jokes we could have
> made about naming characters. But I don't think
> that's what you were
> looking for, is it? Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> ====> -Boondocker
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant
> messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://im.yahoo.com
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.