Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: shadowrn@*********.com (Damion Milliken)
Subject: IQ vs SR Intelligence (was: Yourself as a contact)
Date: Thu Mar 7 22:00:01 2002
Sebastian Wiers writes:

> I always figured IQ's for even very smart people were lower than that, like
> around 140-150, with 160+ being really rare. I dunno, I'm sure somebody can
> describe the bell curve deviations in a second. But I'd expect the scale
> there to run up to a "10" representing people who are 1-in-a-million
> briliant. 10 is actually possible for unmodified humans in SR, its just
> gonna be damn rare. I think the whole scale is also maybe 10 points high-
> many people with a 90 IQ are what would pass for "average" on the street,
> and an attributte score of 4 doesn't really indacate ability that is much
> above average.

Rolling 4 dice as against rolling 3 is a 33% boost to your dice...

Dice TN % Chance of 1 Success
---- -- ---------------------
3 4 87.5
4 4 93.75

So at average tasks (TN 4), a SR character with Intelligence 3 or 4 would
perform about the same.

Dice TN % Chance of 1 Success
---- -- ---------------------
3 6 42.13
4 6 51.77

Whereas at difficult tasks (TN 6), a character with Intelligence 4 has a
decided edge.

I'm not sure if this would accurately represent the difference between
someone with IQ 100 and IQ 120, of course. <has a quick surf> As a side
note, a web page I just surfed to reckoned that an IQ of 120 or greater
represented about the top 10% of the population.

--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong
Unofficial Shadowrun Guru E-mail: dam01@***.edu.au
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d- s++:-- a25 C++ US++>+++ P+ L+>++ E- W+ N++ o@ K- w+(--) O-@ M--
V- PS+ PE- Y+ PGP-@>++ t+ 5 X+>+++ R++ !tv(--) b+ DI+++@ D G+
e++>++++$ h- r++>+++ y->+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.