| From: | shadowrn@*********.com (Gurth) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Yourself as a contact |
| Date: | Sun Mar 10 04:30:01 2002 |
> Actually, no. IQ represents most accurately the skill to score high on IQ
> tests, and little else.
*grin*
> Learning ability is much harder to measure.
Though the test _was_ developed to figure out the subject's ability to learn (so that
it could be seen who needed extra attention -- the US basically inverted its purpose,
though).
--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Dat is de kip voor het ei spannen.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-
GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++@ UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--) O
V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t@ 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
