Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: shadowrn@*********.com (Euphonium)
Subject: PC's vs us (or normal people)
Date: Sun Mar 10 19:10:01 2002
[lots of snips]
>> How many people see themselves as viable PC's?
>Certainly not me, and I have a feeling most other listmembers wouldn't be
up
>to scratch as a shadowrunner, either.
>> the only way I could do a
>> half-reasonable 123 point version of myself was to make myself a physical
>> mage with no magical skills, no spells, some bioware, some cyber, and
>> really pointless adept abilities. I was still a pretty excellent
>> athelete, which isn't quite the truth (by a long shot). As a mundane,
>> there was just no good way to spend all the points, even on knowledge
>> skills. Sad, really.
>>Has anybody
>> played a "joe normal" character who was actually made using the
character
>> creation rules?
>Trying to put an average person into A-E priorities or 123 points will most
>likely give you a lot of low and medium-level skills, most of which will
not
>come in handy in the shadows. Which means you end up with a character who
>likely won't be much fun to play, because everybody else needs to do the
>important stuff for you.

I once a Renraku Arcology Shutdown game with everyone as "Joe Normal"
characters.
The players designed themselves as honestly as possible, with no pre-set
build point total to work to, and then had to justify every skill on their
sheets to the rest of the group. Most people totaled 70-80 build points in
the end. The game worked quite well, because their distinctly average
skills & stats got them to think and plan far better than they did when
everyone had lost of high level combat skills.
The trick I liked the most was when they used an air rifle to plink out
security cameras, then used a big sheet of electrified chickenwire to trap
and fry a pair of medusa drones.

Euphonium

>>>>[I used to be against the idea of Mind Control Lasers, but now I can't
imagine how I ever managed without them]<<<<

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.