Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: shadowrn@*********.com (Gurth)
Subject: Signal locator rating
Date: Wed Mar 27 14:00:04 2002
According to Damion Milliken, on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 the word on the street was...

> > I'm wondering why standard signal locators need a rating.
>
> ECM and jamming, perhaps?

But is that necessary for the signal locator? The tracking signals need to get
through the jamming; the locator is just a receiver.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Dat is de kip voor het ei spannen.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++@ UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--) O
V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t@ 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.