Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: shadowrn@*********.com (shadowrn@*********.com)
Subject: Signal locator rating
Date: Wed Mar 27 14:10:01 2002
In a message dated Wed, 27 Mar 2002 2:03:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, Gurth
<Gurth@******.nl> writes:

> According to Damion Milliken, on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 the word on the street was...
>
> > > I'm wondering why standard signal locators need a rating.
> >
> > ECM and jamming, perhaps?
>
> But is that necessary for the signal locator? The tracking signals need to get
> through the jamming; the locator is just a receiver.


I dont have my books in front of me, however could it do with howmany signals they can
track/locate at one time?

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.