Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: shadowrn@*********.com (Pepe Barbe)
Subject: Signal locator rating
Date: Thu Mar 28 00:50:01 2002
At 01:31 p.m. 27/03/2002, Gurth wrote:
>But is that necessary for the signal locator? The tracking signals need to
>get
>through the jamming; the locator is just a receiver.

The rating of the transmitter is tied to flux, which ties to power. A more
powerful signal travels farther and is less prone to signal noise.
Therefore high powered signals can be protected to jamming and ecm.

But there are other techniques of protection of signal noise; Digital
Signal Processing would be an example.

Maybe for ECM and Jamming, the rating both could be tied. Maybe the mean of
the values round down.

Pepe

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.