Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: belt ammunition
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 19:22:26 +0200
According to Phillip Gawlowski, on Tuesday 06 May 2003 18:11 the word on
the street was...

> I think he means, that there are "placeholder" rounds inserted between
> live munitions, not actually wider connections between the actual
> munitions. Like: R-R-R-R-D-D-D-R-R-R-R (R=Round, D=Dead round)

And the point of this would be what, exactly? The weapon would stop after
four rounds, and then you'd have to pull the charging handle a couple of
times before you can fire again... Except for shooting drills, as Arclight
mentioned, I can't really think of why you'd want anything less than the
full number of rounds in a belt.

> You both have a point: On one hand, gaps in live ammo prevent
> overheating the weapon, and can prevent jamming, OTOH it makes sense to
> leave some space to leave room for attaching several belts for
> continious feed.

Continuous belts are usually attached by means of a round: two "end" links
are hooked together and a round inserted into them to keep them together.
(At least, this is how German belts work; I've never seen a Russian one up
close.) Disintegrating belts _have_ no space, because any empty place in
them means the belt will fall apart.

> > (Changing a BF weapon to FA is easy: just remove the burst control
> > device.)
>
> Well, no. You have to strengthen the mechanism used to handle the stree,
> but that are just replacements of parts.

How so? All current BF-capable weapons -- to stick to SR terms -- either
also have an FA firing mode, or were based on FA weapons. Remove the
counter and you have a weapon that's just as FA-capable as the next
assault rifle.

> IIRC, Cannon Companion has
> rules for changing the firing modes of a weapon.

It does, but for some reason this takes up extra space and weight in the
weapon, even though the text says the weapon is _not_ designed to
withstand the extra stress.

> > The reason for adjustable gas ports is so they can be opened further
> > when the weapon is dirty; the resulting increased ROF in a clean
> > weapon is a side-effect.
>
> Isn't there a danger of the weapon blowing up if more gas is inserted in
> the chamber?

In extreme cases, yes. Which is why the mechanism is there to compensate
for dirt, and not for normal use: the regulator is adjusted to give normal
operating pressure, so that under combat conditions if there is no chance
to clean the weapon, it can be opened further as a temporary measure.
Then, once the weapon has been cleaned, it is closed back up to its normal
setting again.

(I also forgot to mention that another side-effect is that spent casings
will be ejected much more violently if the regulator is opened.)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Hooligans (zn) baldadige watervogel
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.