Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: robertennew@*****.com.au (Robert Ennew)
Subject: belt ammunition
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 18:21:03 +1000 (EST)
--- Gurth <gurth@******.nl> wrote:
> > I think he means, that there are "placeholder"
> rounds inserted between
> > live munitions, not actually wider connections
> between the actual
> > munitions. Like: R-R-R-R-D-D-D-R-R-R-R (R=Round,
> DÞad round)
>
> And the point of this would be what, exactly? The
> weapon would stop after
> four rounds, and then you'd have to pull the
> charging handle a couple of
> times before you can fire again... Except for
> shooting drills, as Arclight
> mentioned, I can't really think of why you'd want
> anything less than the
> full number of rounds in a belt.

I'm not real familiar & I'm only guessing, to avoid
having to pull charging handle a couple of times, you
could even replace the dummy rounds with blanks that
could send the return spring back, would that pan out?

> Continuous belts are usually attached by means of a
> round: two "end" links
> are hooked together and a round inserted into them
> to keep them together.
> (At least, this is how German belts work; I've never
> seen a Russian one up
> close.) Disintegrating belts _have_ no space,
> because any empty place in
> them means the belt will fall apart.

well could you insert an extra "round" & have the belt
still take up?

GZ

http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Mobile
- Check & compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.