From: | gurth@******.nl (Gurth) |
---|---|
Subject: | SR4 Conversion |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:11:38 +0200 |
street was...
> [snip, snip, snip it all. why? because it's all very
> reasonable]
In that case, somebody else must have posted using my nick... ;)
> Since some of the
> people on this list have actually played SR4, I
> suppose I could be presuming too much, but it does
> seem that I'm not entirely missing the mark.
Without saying too much, you may be right in some ways, and wrong in
others :)
> Given that we've been told that attributes will affect
> the character's capabilities differently (...) I
> should say that it might in fact be impossible to find
> a decent method of converting to SR4 any existing SR3
> character without losing an unacceptable amount of
> effectiveness due to the changed rules system.
I don't think it will be impossible, and probably not even very
difficult, if you're willing to accept differences that may be
inevitable due to the new system.
> Perhaps it'll still be rather nice to play an SR3
> character in SR4, but I do suppose anyone who wants to
> be a SOTA-loving shadowrunner would be best off
> regenerating their character under the new ruleset,
> character history permitting.
That was certainly the case with SRII -> SR3. I remember converting a
decker PC's stats and being very unhappy with the outcome; re-doing him
entirely with the SR3 chargen rules also wasn't perfect, but better than
the straight conversion.
--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
de limme
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-
GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998