Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: SR4 Conversion
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:11:38 +0200
According to Jan Jaap van Poelgeest, on 26-7-05 13:35 the word on the
street was...

> [snip, snip, snip it all. why? because it's all very
> reasonable]

In that case, somebody else must have posted using my nick... ;)

> Since some of the
> people on this list have actually played SR4, I
> suppose I could be presuming too much, but it does
> seem that I'm not entirely missing the mark.

Without saying too much, you may be right in some ways, and wrong in
others :)

> Given that we've been told that attributes will affect
> the character's capabilities differently (...) I
> should say that it might in fact be impossible to find
> a decent method of converting to SR4 any existing SR3
> character without losing an unacceptable amount of
> effectiveness due to the changed rules system.

I don't think it will be impossible, and probably not even very
difficult, if you're willing to accept differences that may be
inevitable due to the new system.

> Perhaps it'll still be rather nice to play an SR3
> character in SR4, but I do suppose anyone who wants to
> be a SOTA-loving shadowrunner would be best off
> regenerating their character under the new ruleset,
> character history permitting.

That was certainly the case with SRII -> SR3. I remember converting a
decker PC's stats and being very unhappy with the outcome; re-doing him
entirely with the SR3 chargen rules also wasn't perfect, but better than
the straight conversion.

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
de limme
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.