| From: | gurth@******.nl (Gurth) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | SR4 Conversion |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:47:01 +0200 |
was...
>> Both have their good and their bad points. IMHO the good/bad balance
>> of the new system is about the same as with the old -- there are some
>> things I don't like, but that gets compensated by there being other
>> things that I do like, and didn't like the equivalent SR3 rules for
>> (still with me? :)
>
> How do you know? Have you signed the NDA, or has somebody else broken
> theirs?
Would I say something like the above if I hadn't played it? :) Yes, like
several others on the list, I've read several drafts of the rules in
order to playtest them.
--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
de limme
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-
GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
