Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: scott@**********.com (Scott Harrison)
Subject: SR4 Conversion
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:02:15 -0400
On Jul 28, 2005, at 11:39, Gurth wrote:

> According to Scott Harrison, on 28-7-05 16:20 the word on the street
> was...
>
>> I am sure I will come out with some silly program that will
>> calculate odds for people once I know what the new system is.
>
> That information is already available: roll your dice, and all 5s and
> 6s are successes. All you need to do a diceroller is to have it ask
> for the number of dice, and do that many random() calls.

Actually, the concept of rolling against a TN of 5 is not a problem.
The problem is no one has explained how things work well enough for a
program to be written. I have looked at the FAQs and read the postings
on this list (not on any forum though), and have determined I need a
set of rules because there are so many questions. Coming up with a
table that shows 33% success for 1 die, etc. is pretty easy. But it
does not reflect anything in the game system. So I just wait, and when
I come up with the code hopefully you can once again provide the Dutch
localization. :-)

> In fact, I have a half-finished Dashboard widget that does just that,
> but it needs a lot more work (or possibly a complete restart, because
> it's a bit of a mess :)
>
Don't you just hate those half-finished projects? I have three
versions of the frameworks for an SR character generator --
Objective-C, Java and then back to Objective-C again. Pain in the butt
it is. I will most likely do the one for SR3 first and then worry
about one for SR4 later (since I do not envision playing that myself
for a while if at all). I'll let you handle the Dashboard widgets
since we do not want everyone doing the same thing. :-)

--
Scott Harrison

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.