Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Lightning Ball vs Vehicle. Uber Spell or How Does It Work?
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:10:10 +0200
According to Lone Eagle, on 29-7-05 14:03 the word on the street was...

> But the sphere has to reach the target first, the example in the rules
> talks about transparent barriers and the fact that they don't stop a
> power ball but the guy hiding behind the wall won't be effected since
> the caster cannot see him...

That's combat spells, which work differently, and so they don't concern
us ATM :)

> It then goes on to say that elemental manipulations are impeded by
> "glass and other barriers" and that firing through barriers rules apply

I think that applies to hitting your target with a single-target EM
spell, like Flamethrower. This would have to go through a barrier in
order to reach a target standing behind, say, a glass window, and so the
normal barrier rules apply.

> - as we've already determined the vehicle itself is unharmed so
> everything inside it is likewise protected.

And that's where I beg to differ :) Since we're quoting rules, those on
page 182 of SR3 specifically say: "Targets hidden behind a wall within
the radius of a Fireball spell will still get cooked, even if the caster
cannot see them." To me, this means a vehicle's passengers will still be
hit even if the vehicle itself is unharmed and they have the opacity (?)
of the windows turned up to 11.

> It's also worth noting that the rules state that they effect an area in
> the same way as a physical explosion (centre out presumably)

True, and I find this a bit unfortunate. I think what it's supposed to
mean is "They hit everyone within the blast radius, like a grenade", and
not "They explode from the center outward, like a grenade".

> remember that the caster cannot target the spell inside the vehicle
> because of the barrier effect

There would be no need; the average car is not larger than 12 meters, so
directly above its center point would do just fine :)

> and if they try they're aiming at a base
> 12 for blind fire anyway...

That would apply, yes. You'd be unlikely to hurt a rigger inside a car,
unless you roll rather well.

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
de limme
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.