From:	l-hansen@*****.tele.dk (Lars Wagner Hansen)
Subject:	SR4 Conversion
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:16:36 +0200

From: "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl>
> According to Lars Wagner Hansen, on 27-7-05 23:56 the word on the street
> was...
>
>>> Both have their good and their bad points. IMHO the good/bad balance of
>>> the new system is about the same as with the old -- there are some
>>> things I don't like, but that gets compensated by there being other
>>> things that I do like, and didn't like the equivalent SR3 rules for
>>> (still with me? :)
>>
>> How do you know? Have you signed the NDA, or has somebody else broken
>> theirs?
>
> Would I say something like the above if I hadn't played it? :) Yes, like
> several others on the list, I've read several drafts of the rules in order
> to playtest them.

I've seen loads of people say loads of things about SR4, whithout them
actually knowing any more than what has been printed in the FAQs. They
should know better.

Lars