| From: | zebulingod@*******.net (Zebulin) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Lightning Ball vs Vehicle. Uber Spell or How Does It Work? |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:42:55 -0700 |
#
#At 08:13 PM 7/29/2005, Graht wrote:
#>Not true.
#>
#>http://www.lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/vehicle_strike.html
#
#OK.
#My previous standpoint was based on personal experience and
#gathered data - this describes things which didn't crop up...
#So allow me to revise my ideas.
#
#Give the vehicle a crash test when it is subjected to any
#Elemental manipulation - success indicates no real damage to
#the vehicle, failure indicates minor damage to systems and/or
#tyres and if the number of ones outweigh the number of
#successes regardless of pass or fail then apply major damage
#to the systems, tyres...etc and require another crash test -
#this time to avoid actually crashing.
#
I don't think a crash test would work quite right. After all, you're making
a test based on the skill of the driver to avoid the damage? How's the skill
of the driver affect direct electrical damage to the car's systems?
Zebulin
AIM: zebulingod
ICQ: 21932827
WEB: http://www.zebulin.com/
MSN: zebulingod
YIM: zebulingod
SRGC: SR1 SR2++ SR3+++ h+ b+++ !B UB IE+
RN+ STK++ W- dk+ ri++ m-(d++) gm++ M- P++
