From: | kelvaris@***********.us (Jeff Haskell) |
---|---|
Subject: | Lightning Ball vs Vehicle. Uber Spell or How Does It Work? [OT] |
Date: | Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:30:22 -0800 |
Lone Eagle wrote:
#
#A LAW isn't anti-vehicle. The rules do a pretty good job of
#making it all but useless against anything more than a light
#skinned vehicle. Hence - in exactly the same way as the real
#66mm LAW - it becomes much more useful for Bunker Busting than
#anything else...
#
Thank you, I was going to mention that, myself. LAWs *aren't* "anti-vehicle"
although their name sure suggests they are.
[Shadow responded]
I don't know what you guys consider 'Light' but the LAW weapon systems I
used blew the hell out of all the vehicles we shot with it.
Here is a link that gives you some more info
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m72.htm
Sure it isn't going to work against the Front armor of a MBT, but against
anything lighter it gave people a very bad day.
-Shadow