Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: kelvaris@***********.us (Jeff Haskell)
Subject: Lightning Ball vs Vehicle. Uber Spell or How Does It Work? [OT]
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:30:22 -0800
?

Lone Eagle wrote:
#
#A LAW isn't anti-vehicle. The rules do a pretty good job of
#making it all but useless against anything more than a light
#skinned vehicle. Hence - in exactly the same way as the real
#66mm LAW - it becomes much more useful for Bunker Busting than
#anything else...
#

Thank you, I was going to mention that, myself. LAWs *aren't* "anti-vehicle"
although their name sure suggests they are.

[Shadow responded]

I don't know what you guys consider 'Light' but the LAW weapon systems I
used blew the hell out of all the vehicles we shot with it.

Here is a link that gives you some more info
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m72.htm

Sure it isn't going to work against the Front armor of a MBT, but against
anything lighter it gave people a very bad day.

-Shadow

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.