Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Legal Magic
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:01:35 +0200
According to Stephen Eley, on 16-8-05 20:23 the word on the street was...

> The only way to tell if the magician *knows* a given spell would be to
> use Mind Probe or some other interrogation spell, and that ought to be
> inadmissible in court. (In the UCAS, if they still have any shreds
> left of the US Constitution, it would violate the defendant's Fifth
> Amendment rights.)

Something to that effect is stated in one or two books, but I don't
remember right away which ones.

> So come to think of it, yes, in a country where Mind Probes were
> acceptable for prosecutors (Aztlan, perhaps)

This is normal procedure in many NAN countries -- their courts are (in
theory) about finding out what really happened, not about finding out
who has the best lawyer :)

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
de limme
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UB+ P(+) L++ E W++(--) N o? K w-- O
M+ PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.