Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: snicker@*********.net (snicker@*********.net)
Subject: Reduced Printing/Distribution of Limited Edition SR4?
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:15 +0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Hyde [mailto:derek@***************.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 04:43 PM
>
>
> > My apologies then, it's just the distributor for my local shop that had it's
> > head planted in its ass and put out bad information....
> >
> Though.....in addition to that thought, I don't think I agree with the
> "you've got to buy 12 originals for every 1 limited you need to order" is
> exactly a fair thing, it kills chances of those of us that're wanting the
> book but don't live in an area that SR is played enough that our local
> gaming store could actually SELL the 12 originals (or in the case of my
> shop, the 48 originals he'd have had to order for the 4 limited editions
> that he had pre-orders in for). It just kind of sucks a little bit, sorry
> to whine about it, but....it does.

Actually, the thing you *should* be upset about is that people who ordered online weeks
after you made *your* preorder are going to get theirs for only about $6 more than what
you would have paid. (says that guy who ordered from Battlecorps). Talk about cutting the
throats of retail shops... Personally, if I were doing it, I'd've done two things:
I'd've limited it to gencon and retail storefronts only (no online mass distributors).
This encourages people to actually go INTO the stores. Retail marketing shows that people
browsing a shop are more likely to purchase related materials than people purchasing
online. Impulse buys increase significantly with proper placement and marketing.
Second, I'd've launched a line of minis simultaneous - covering the basics of the game for
the "new to Shadowrun" group. Heck, even clix minis would be better than
nothing.

Snicker

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.