Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Brian E. Angliss" <ANGLISS@***.PSU.EDU>
Subject: Wrong one, I'm afraid
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 20:10:15 -0500
>>>>>[We have our Lucifer's confused, or rather you do. I speak of the
King
of Ghenna, the Prince of Darkness, or if those lofty references don't lend
themselves to understanding, Satan of the old Dante's Inferno, the book. You
know, fallen angels and all that drek? Not the decker, though I would have
enjoyed seeing his filter...]<<<<<
-- Dante(20:11:44/01-14-55)
Message no. 2
From: Phaeros Lostchilde <shilberg@********.UNI.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Wrong one, I'm afraid
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 1994 00:11:18 -0600
>>>>>[I have seen his filter. I use one similar to it. Crypts and undead.
I
need it to survive, nowadays.]<<<<
- Necromancer <00:05:54/01-15-55>

>>>>>[Since you appear to be halfway sober, Ded-boy old pal, we need to
talk.
Now.]<<<<<
- Icepick <00:06:56/01-15-55>
Message no. 3
From: Randy Barron <rbarron@*****.CS.DU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Wrong one, I'm afraid
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 23:15:49 -0700
>>>>>[ Crypts and undead? how cute...
Tell me something, are there leucrotta
and toxics and banshees? Oh my! Please,
don't hurt me for mangling it to suit
my purposes... ]<<<<<
-- Silent Knight <10:27:11/01-14-56>
Message no. 4
From: Phaeros Lostchilde <shilberg@********.UNI.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Wrong one, I'm afraid
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 1994 21:32:22 -0600
>>>>>[No. Just liches, skeletons, ghasts, zombies, and all manner of bad
things. Icepick - I need to talk to you too. I have a problem....Talk to you
at the Skyline.]<<<<<
- Necromancer <09:26:45/01-15-55>

>>>>>[My, my, a sober response. All right, Ded-boy. See you
there.]<<<<<
- Icepick <09:27:43/01-15-55>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Wrong one, I'm afraid, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.