Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Thomas W. Craig" <Craigtw1@***.COM>
Subject: Anti-Magick debate Legislation
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 23:48:30 -0500
I understand that debates on whether or not magick exists frustrates a lot of
people; BUT as Magick IS a part of Shadowrun, it is relevant. Not very, but
it is. More relevant than the discussions of the plotlines of Babylon 5 and
Star Trek. If I cannot discuss the existence of Magick on this forum, then
noone can discuss B5 and any other NON-relevant materials; even if one of the
persons involved IS a list administrator. Same punishment for same crime,
yes, even for the admin. If the admin don't follow the same rules and
regulations as the rest of us, the rules and regulations should not be in
place AT ALL.
Just making a point,
Tom Craig

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Anti-Magick debate Legislation, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.