Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Mike Goldberg <m_goldberg@**.COLORADO.EDU>
Subject: Awww drek...
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 15:18:37 MST
***** Private: Gunner
>>>>>[ Holy drek man. I can't believe what you did to that miserable slot.
Anyway that's pretty meaningless now, I guess. I finally broke the encryption.
I think I might have an idea on what's going on. Scourge needs to see ASAP.
Unfortunately, _I_ don't feel safe transmitting it on matrix. Swing by, I'll
be at shop. ]<<<<<
-- Sprinkler <14:10:34/3-16-56>

***** Private: Scourge
>>>>>[ Any luck finding the sniper? I got some nuke-meltdown data from
C.A.
that _SHOULD_ be important to you. Unfortunately, I don't feel safe
broadcasting it you via here. Which means you need to tell "Gunner" how to get
it to you. Later ]<<<<<
-- Sprinkler <14:12:23/3-16-56>

***** Private: Scourge
>>>>>[ Got enough fragging enemies? Damn, I thought having HAMMER as one
was
bad.

Anyway, I think enough data to nail the guy who pulled the hit and the person
who asked for it. Curious, eh?

+++++ include case.dat

I figure if normal conviction procedures the guy could skate but his rep would
be ruined. Handled by KE, he might grill though due to inter-department
fights. No chance on catching the sniper unless you feel like spending money.
]<<<<<
-- Ratspeak <14:16:04/3-16-59>

>>>>>[ Hey Courier, care to send me the stuff you got on the sniper you are
following? I think there may be a chance that your sniper might be the one
gunning for DragonEyes.

Of course the other options aren't too pretty either.

Oh -- while I'm here . . . it appears that Doc Wagon lost DragonEyes. No clue
at this point if it was on purpose or because of a run. ]<<<<<
-- Ratspeak <14:17:59/3-16-56>

M_GOLDBERG@**.colorado.edu

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Awww drek..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.