Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: ANGLISS BRIAN EDWARD <angliss@****.COLORADO.EDU>
Subject: Re: Aztechnology? What the hell?
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 17:39:49 -0600
*****PRIVATE: Moonwalker
>>>>>[Dad's asleep right now, but he did tell me to tell you to go for it
on the autopsy report. It could clear up some stuff, I hope.]<<<<<
-- Diana, Mistress of the Night <09:49:59/10-24-56>

>>>>>[Shade, you seem to be the expert. Do you know why Dad would have
attacked me suddenly like that? Roxey had to blast him hard to keep him
from killing me! I don't understand it. And the creature fraggin near
ignored my spell. And Roxey tried to banish it too, with no effect. I
can tell you what it looked like in Astral, though. A big, violet thing
with pseudopods going all over the place. Does that help ID the fraggin
thing?]<<<<<
-- Diana, Mistress of the Night <09:52:43/10-24-56>
Message no. 2
From: "Benjamin L. Schlitt" <Baldandar@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Aztechnology? What the hell?
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 01:42:19 -0400
>>>>>[Attention all Seattle dwellers on this list. I have recently
correlated enough data to make an almost perfect match with this creature.
If it is what I think it is, then we have much bigger problems than I
thought.
Diana, I would like a better description if possible. Could you
draw me an image.
Jackson, thank you for the location and the wonderful car ride.
Mac, I need to see you as soon as possible. You may be the only
one who can confirm my theories. This is an ASAP situation.
Commander Drake, thank you for quibbling over details and
generally wasting my time.
The reason I require some information from Mac, is that if this
creature is what it appears to be; then it is out of my area of specialty.
Hec, its out of just about everyone's area of specialty inside of
parapsychology. As soon as I am certain, I will tell everyone. I do not
wish to start a panic. That would only aid the creature.]<<<<<
-- Shade <24:19:08 / 10-25-56>
Message no. 3
From: SCN User <bd042@***.ORG>
Subject: Re: Aztechnology? What the hell?
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 23:10:48 -0700
>>>>>[ "We have big problems" he says. "It's completely out
of normal,"
he says. And he doesn't wanna start a panic? seesh! ]<<<<<
--Moonwalker (commandment/#11)
Message no. 4
From: "Thomas W. Craig" <Craigtw1@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Aztechnology? What the hell?
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 03:09:21 -0400
>>>>>[Shade, I may be able to aid you...you and I should meet at the place
where the creature was last seen.]<<<<<
-- Olorin (00:05:30 PDT/ 10:25:56)

>>>>>[Shade, where at?]<<<<<
-- Mac (00:06:30 PDT/ 10:25:56)
Message no. 5
From: "Benjamin L. Schlitt" <Baldandar@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Aztechnology? What the hell?
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 23:45:38 -0400
*****PRIVATE: Mac, Olorin
>>>>>[Meet me at <encrypted>, the creature's actual nature I will not
reveal
till Friday at 22:00:00.]<<<<<
-- Shade <20:34:16 / 10-16-56>
Message no. 6
From: "Thomas W. Craig" <Craigtw1@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Aztechnology? What the hell?
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 02:03:43 -0400
*****PRIVATE: Shade
>>>>>[I will be there.]<<<<<
-- Mac (23:00:30 PDT/ 10:26:56)
Message no. 7
From: bd042@***.org (SCN User)
Subject: Aztechnology? What the hell?
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 22:31:26 -0700
*****PRIVATE: Action Jackson
>>>>>[As of now, the newly expanded Shadowland has been recovered and
is back on-line. Your friendly neighborhood SysOps had to duck and run,
and we blew the bunker with about twenty seconds to spare. But I'm back
(with a newfound respect for thermite) and I'd like to assist you with
this thing; it looks like a real mess. Glad I wasn't there myself last
night. If you ARE interested in autopsy reports and DNA scans, I should
be able to hack LS's files. Whaddaya say?]<<<<<
--Moonwalker <new&/improved>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Aztechnology? What the hell?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.