Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Brian Rogers <rogers@****.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Good Morning
Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 11:17:56 -0500
***** PRIVATE: Cybil
>>>>>[Greetings.

I wish I could tell you that I have both good news and bad news, but,
unfortunately, I have only bad news at this point. The investigation has
been shut down and my funding through Lone Star cut. We've had no leads
in over a month and, well, that is usually longer than we stay on a case
anyway.

The ritual sample we managed to get from the last crime scene ended up being
tampered with in some way and was rendered useless. IA is investigating
but I believe it will come down to "Improper Handling of Evidence" and a
slap on the wrist for the field Op who did it.

Im sorry.]<<<<<
-- Kor <16:06:15 / 05-13-57>

***** PRIVATE: Trixie
>>>>>[Would I be able to interest you in a little hanky panky on the side?

I figure you'd turn me down anyway so, how about dinner tonight? There is a
new place opening up in up-town and I dont have a date. I've arranged for
NB to be a bit too busy tonight to join us.]<<<<<
-- Jason R. Stormwind <16:09:02 / 05-13-57>

***** PRIVATE: Jason Stormwind
>>>>>[What is this? It takes me getting engaged for you to start taking
notice
in me?

Yeah, sure, I'll go. Sounds like fun.]<<<<<
-- Trixie <16:09:01 / 05-13-57>
Message no. 2
From: Evan Hughes <ehughes@****.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: Good Morning
Date: Mon, 13 May 96 23:34:10 EDT
*****PRIVATE TO: Kor
>>>>>[Drek. Same at my end. Well, not so much funding, as a lack of
information. On the other hand, I've come up with about 20 pulses of brown
haired couples... I'm in the process of weeding out duplicates.

Keep me informed if anything happens.]<<<<<
-- Cybil <23:32:50/05-14-57>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Good Morning, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!