Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Brian E. Angliss" <ANGLISS@******.BITNET>
Subject: Hope you brought your stuff....
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 13:26:54 -0500
*****PRIVATE: Revenge/Rescue Crew
>>>>>[Ripley, bring in your phaeton. We'll be needing it. And Chris, if
you
can get here soon, we can use you to work outside. I wouldn't want to risk
your job with Freddy. I'll be picking up Roxey in AJ's Hudson, and it'll run
alongside the Phaeton without too much difficulty. Considering that it only
looks like a Hudson, and was a gift from three people who lived a long time
and then gave thier only possession to AJ--the car. It's had a lot of optional
extras installed. I'm sure that AJ will be happy to show you them when we
get him out, Ripley. Let's hope we don't need them. If you haven't arrived
yet, get here soon and come prepared for anything.]<<<<<
-- Slash <13:28:33/01-30-56>
Message no. 2
From: Brion Wauters <BDW2@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Hope you brought your stuff....
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 21:54:15 -0700
***** Private : Revenge/Rescue Crew
>>>>>[Hell, maybe I should bring my truck along as well. It may not be as
fast as Ripley's Phaeton, but it has more armor than some security vehicles,
and a pair of surprises for anyone who gets in its way.]<<<<<
-- Irish <21:53:55/01-30-56>
Message no. 3
From: Hunter <hunter@******.STAT.COM>
Subject: Re: Hope you brought your stuff....
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 10:07:08 MST
*****PRIVATE: Slash
>>>>>[Imay just take you up on that look at the Hudson, depending upon
how all this turns out. I'm on route to Denver now, and I've got Caine,
his wife and Jayna with me. We'll arrive in plenty of time to do
this.]<<<<<
-- Ripley <10:15:46/01-31-56>

----
hunter@******.stat.com (Hunter)
'the computer handyman' - 602/548-9706

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Hope you brought your stuff...., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.