Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: mneideng@****.caltech.edu (Mark L. Neidengard)
Subject: Re: J&G again...
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 14:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>>[Well, that sounds like a bad day and a half, Lynch, and no mistake.
It's
a good thing that Interpol isn't better funded: even with the standard 121,
the least that some of the more exotic ammo I've seen used would have done is
blown off your leg...I suppose sniping is one of those things that's good for
both genders of goose. Good for cooking them for dinner, anyway.

As I'm sure you would agree, _some_ corporate security forces are easy meat.
The more interesting your target is, the better it is _likely_ to be
defended if the corp is competent, and this can occasionally turn up the most
irritating surprises. Speaking of which, by the way...some of y'all folks
claiming to know your way around a computer had best beware of a little gem
called Seraphim0.0a. When the Bible describes the seraphim as the guardians
of the Mercy Seat, believe it.

In any event, I suspect that picking on the Dynamic Duo is nothing but a waste
of bandwidth. If nothing else, I can categorically confirm that there is
_no_ sexual aid based on any chemical present in substantial quantities in
tuna. There _is_ of course the canonical Node for recipes, if you can find it
and get past the IC. I should warn you that I designed some of it as a
Sporadic Deputy Co-Archive Maintainer, and you might find it hard to evade what
CheshireNeko does when she gets mad. =) In the final analysis though, there's
no dangerless chemical known that can't be manufactured by your own body, under
the right circumstances (those in the know would concur =)

God it's good to have some free time again, however fleetingly =) ]<<<<<
-- Azrael <14:08:51 / 07-02-57>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about J&G again..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.