Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Can I play with madness <MKNABUSCH@******.BITNET>
Subject: ladies?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 1994 00:23:11 -0500
>>>>>[C'mon St.John. There's definately ladies
here. 'Sides, if any real ladies did see that,
I'd think they'd be busy hunting you down. *grin*
I know Sabre and Styx wanted too. Now Cerise and
the Ravens (mage and the decker) would probably do
it too. Heh heh heh. Off to work.]<<<<<
-Harlequin <Ha-Ha-Ha>
Message no. 2
From: The Backrub Guru <lozanom@******.ENMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: ladies?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 1994 21:34:54 +0200
>>>>>[Harlequin: Oh, I don't doubt that there are ladies on
this board. My comment was directed in sincere interest in
the location of these ladies, not to suggest that the women
on this board weren't ladies. I appolgize for any mis-
understanding this has caused, and special appologies to
Sabre and Styx, and to Cerise and the Ravens. Please allow
me the chance to reconcile myself; if there is anything I can
do to help you ladies and gentlemen out, please let me know.]<<<<<
-- StJohn <12:34:25/03-31-55>
Message no. 3
From: Brad Shantz <bshantz@****.COM>
Subject: Re: ladies?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 1994 11:49:08 PST
>>>>>[Ahem, just for those who wonder if there are ladies on this board.
Jasmine is a lady (me). I was offended, but that's my own business and will
not cut down on my business with others. If you can't overlook something as
small and insignificant as a statement like that, then your not worth your
weight on the street. Just to throw in my two cents]<<<<<
-- Jasmine
Message no. 4
From: Bona' na Croin <MHILLIARD@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: ladies?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 1994 21:40:39 -0500
>>>>>[Damn right I would, drekhead.]<<<<<
-- Raven <**:**:**/**-**-**>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about ladies?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!