Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: angliss@********.edu (Brian Angliss)
Subject: Re: Lynch's testimony, Drake's hearing
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 10:31:08 -0700
>>>>>[I'm certain that they thought it was secure at the time. It pays to
>>>>>have excellent contacts, or blackmail candidates. Then again, what's
>>>>>the difference these days? Oh, I heard recently that Lt. Colonel Jose
>>>>>Montoya testified yesterday. Hopefully I'll get ahold of the tapes
>>>>>within the next day or so.]<<<<<
-- Trideo Pirate <10:26:48/10-04-57>
Message no. 2
From: "Paul J. Adam" <shadowtk@********.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Lynch's testimony, Drake's hearing
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 09:43:03 +0100
*****PRIVATE: Blademaster
>>>>>[Thanks for the thoughts, and the offer of help. Want to meet up
for a few beers sometime?

Coppinger recruited me to SIGA a few months after it all blew up. Back
then I was only called in once in a while. As things got bigger - like
Maxim acquiring nukes, which if we'd had people in the shadows we might
have seen coming - and the Warsaw hit, I ended up spending more and more
time "consulting" so I ended up going virtually full-time.

Used to be a freelance merc, used to be Ares Security, used to be a
runner, used to be a cop... I've been around a while <g>]<<<<<
-- Lynch <09:43:10/10-05-57>
Message no. 3
From: Kris Kevin Maxwell <km10@*********.pg.cc.md.us>
Subject: Re: Lynch's testimony, Drake's hearing
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 09:08:49 -0400 (EDT)
*****Private:Lynch
>>>>>[Yes, you have been around a while. Ever deal with Vampire's or a
Dragon? As for the beer's, I can't stand them, I much prefer hard liquor.
On the other hand, if you'd like meet up and have a few drinks, that sounds
great.]<<<<<
-- Blademaster <09:06:57/10-07-57>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Lynch's testimony, Drake's hearing, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.