Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
Subject: More Psycho stuff.
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 93 03:36:03 CET
>>>>>[ That wouldn't work, Highlander. You silly mundanes think magic can
do
anything. There are even limitations on the greatest thing on Earth.
]<<<<<
-- Cerise <18:40:24/03-21-54>

>>>>>[ Cerise is right. When you trace a person with a material link, you
are
taking a weak trace of their aura and tracing down the stronger presense which
is that person. The reverse would be impossible because the other sources would
not be strong enough and there would be too many possible smaller sources to be
confused by. ]<<<<<
-- Raven the Mage <18:63:31/03-21-54>

>>>>>[ Hey, here's an idea. Since I look to competent, let's disguise Jaez
as
an Elf and use her for bait. ]<<<<<
-- Cerise <18:44:58/03-21-54>

>>>>>[ You never stop do you? ]<<<<<
-- Raven the Mage <18:45:28/03-21-54>
Message no. 2
From: Reality can be useful <MHILLIARD@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: More Psycho stuff.
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 93 00:11:00 EDT
>>>>>[You can't find the killer that way, but there are other
possibilities. I
have Witches and Druids in my family back to the Burning Times, so I know a
few tricks that haven't been "rediscovered" yet. One of them is a
"spell"
called Retrocognition. It's pretty simple. At the scene of the crime, it is
possible to invoke a vision of what transpired. If nothing else, the person
who performs the ritual will know what the killer looks like. Sometimes it
provides other insights as well. Magick defies quantification, in spite of
all the Hermetic effort to the contrary.
There are also some techniques that only qualified Forensic Magicians are
supposed to know. Maybe whatsisname, Cooper, can shed some light
there.]<<<<<
Cat Dancing <00:10:33/3-22-54>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about More Psycho stuff., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!