Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Evan Hughes <ehughes@****.carleton.ca>
Subject: Okaaaaaay
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 95 12:06:08 EST
*****PRIVATE TO: Marksanspensah
>>>>>[... Um... I'm afraid your last post didn't make too much sense.
Either line noise, or your ghostline is losing cohesion. If you like I
know of a few sites that have pirated jack OSes...]<<<<<
-- Tobai Dark <12:03:38/12-10-56>
Message no. 2
From: JOHN SPAIN <93135653@****.dcu.ie>
Subject: Re: Okaaaaaay
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 18:18:38 +0000 (GMT)
*****PRIVATE: Tobai Dark
>>>>>[What are you talking about?]<<<<<
-- Marksanspensah (12:25:12/12-10-56)
Message no. 3
From: Evan Hughes <ehughes@****.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: Okaaaaaay
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 95 18:17:13 EST
*****PRIVATE TO: Marksanspensah
>>>>>[There was a bunch of semi-coherent line noise in your last message
to me. It looked a lot like some sort of crosstalk. Are you using a local
area net? 'Cause if you are, I'd get the sysadmin to take a goog look
around, because there was some really bizarre stuff in that...]<<<<<
-- Tobai Dark <18:18:53/12-10-56>
Message no. 4
From: "Freddy Frypp no more" <JAMES-CUENO@*********.edu>
Subject: Re: Okaaaaaay
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 12:44:49 CST
***** Private: Tobai Dark
>>>>>[Nope. Everything checks out. I had -

+++++ SIGNAL ALTERATION - CONTINUING

Strange you should refer to me as Marksanspensah's id. I've lately
thought of myself as his superego.

Do not meddle.

+++++ SIGNAL ALTERATION - CONTINUING

Buuuut, this smmmegin' daaatajack is giving me sommmme vicious
migraines. I probably just need to go see a chiro.]<<<<<
-- Marksanspensah (12:50:12 / 12-13-56)
Message no. 5
From: Evan Hughes <ehughes@****.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: Okaaaaaay
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 95 17:47:33 EST
***** Private: Marksanspensah
>>>>>[Get yourself checked out. Here's a cut&paste of part of your last
message:

> +++++ SIGNAL ALTERATION - CONTINUING
>
> Strange you should refer to me as Marksanspensah's id. I've lately
> thought of myself as his superego.
>
> Do not meddle.
>
> +++++ SIGNAL ALTERATION - CONTINUING

Just so you know I'm not fragging with you, I got a line clarity histogram
here. I know it can be faked, but it might be useful -- and beleive me on
this one chummer, I have absolutely _no_ reason to mess with you. I'm not
even a full runner, I just do it for the thrills.

Good luck, I hope you get this cleaned out. Mail me again.]<<<<<
-- Tobai Dark <17:49:18/12-13-56>
Message no. 6
From: "Freddy Frypp no more" <JAMES-CUENO@*********.edu>
Subject: Re: Okaaaaaay
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 15:40:59 CST
> ***** Private: Marksanspensah
***** Private: Tobai Dark
>>>>>[Are you sure the problem's not at your end. There's -

+++++ SIGNAL ALTERATION - CONTINUING

I've already warned you once. Do not involve yourself in what does
not concern you.

+++++ SIGNAL ALTERATION - CONTINUING

- nnnnnothing at thiss end. That sug- sugggge - suggests any
problems. Maybe you oughta get yourself checked, old man.]<<<<<
-- Marksanspensah (15:32:22 / 12-14-56)
Message no. 7
From: Evan Hughes <ehughes@****.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: Okaaaaaay
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 95 21:36:05 EST
***** Private: Marksanspensah
>>>>>[It's happened again. I had my jack checked and scanned two weeks
ago, all the connects are okay. The following cut and paste is an analogue
cut from my deck's input jack: ie, it hasn't even been touched by the
hardware at my end yet. The munch follows:

> +++++ SIGNAL ALTERATION - CONTINUING
>
> I've already warned you once. Do not involve yourself in what does
> not concern you.
>
> +++++ SIGNAL ALTERATION - CONTINUING

Do yourself a favour and visit a good cyberdoc...]<<<<<
-- Tobai Dark <21:36:12/12-14-56>
Message no. 8
From: "Freddy Frypp no more" <JAMES-CUENO@*********.edu>
Subject: Re: Okaaaaaay
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 10:39:12 CST
***** Private: Tobai Dark
>>>>>[Toby, I think AJ would take offense at that last
comment.]<<<<<
-- Marksanspensah (10:36:23 / 12-15-56)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.